vblang

2025-12-10 0 829

Visual Basic .NET Language Design

Welcome to the official repo for Visual Basic .NET language design.

  • Full Language Specification: Markdown
  • List of proposals can be found in the proposals folder.
  • Archives of notes from design meetings, etc., can be found in the meetings folder.

If you discover bugs or deficiencies in the above, please leave an issue to raise them, or even better: a pull request to fix them.

For new feature proposals, however, please raise them for discussion, and only submit a proposal as a pull request if invited to do so by a member of the Language Design Team (a \”champion\”).

Discussion

Discussion pertaining to language features takes place in the form of issues in this repo, under the Discussion label.

If you want to suggest a feature, discuss current design notes or proposals, etc., please open a new issue, and it will be tagged Discussion.

GitHub is not ideal for discussions, but it is beneficial to have language features discussed nearby to where the design artifacts are. Comment threads that are short and stay on topic are much more likely to be read. If you leave comment number fifty, chances are that only a few people will read it. To make discussions easier to navigate and benefit from, please observe a few rules of thumb:

  • Discussion should be relevant to Visual Basic .NET language design. Issues that are not will be summarily closed.
  • Choose a descriptive title for the issue, that clearly communicates the scope of discussion.
  • Stick to the topic of the issue title. If a comment is tangential, start a new issue and link back.
  • If a comment goes into detail on a subtopic, also consider starting a new issue and linking back.
  • Is your comment useful for others to read, or can it be adequately expressed with an emoji reaction to an existing comment?

Design Process

Visual Basic .NET is designed by the Visual Basic .NET Language Design Team (LDT).

  1. To submit, support, and discuss ideas please use the Discussion label.

  2. Ideas that the LDT feel could potentially make it into the language should be turned into proposals, based on this template, either by members of the LDT or by community members by invitation from the LDT. The lifetime of a proposal is described in proposals/README.md. A good proposal should:

    • Fit with the general theme and aesthetic of the language.
    • Not introduce subtly alternate syntax for existing features.
    • Add a lot of value for a clear set of users.
    • Not add significantly to the complexity of the language, especially for new users.
  3. A prototype owner (who may or may not be proposal owner) should implement a prototype in their own fork of the Roslyn repo and share it with the design team and community for feedback. A prototype must meet the following bar:

    • Parsing (if applicable) should be resilient to experimentation–typing should not cause crashes.
    • Include minimal tests demonstrating the feature at work end-to-end.
    • Include minimal IDE support (keyword coloring, formatting, completion).
  4. Once a prototype has proven out the proposal and the proposal has been approved-in-principle by the design team, a feature owner (who may or may not be proposal or prototype owner(s)) implemented in a feature branch of the Roslyn repo. The bar for implementation quality can be found here.

  5. Design changes during the proposal or feature implementation phase should be fed back into the original proposal as a PR describing the nature of the change and the rationale.

  6. A PR should be submitted amending the formal language specification with the new feature or behavior.

  7. Once a feature is implemented and merged into shipping branch of Roslyn and the appropriate changes merged into the language specification, the proposal should be archived under a folder corresponding to the version of the language in which it was included, e.g. VB 15.1 proposals). Rejected proposals are archived under the rejected folder.

Language Design Meetings

Language Design Meetings (LDMs) are held by the LDT and occasional invited guests, and are documented in Design Meeting Notes in the meetings folder, organized in folders by year. The lifetime of a design meeting note is described in meetings/README.md. LDMs are where decisions about future Visual Basic .NET versions are made, including which proposals do work on, how to evolve the proposals, and whether and when to adopt them.

Implementation

The reference implementation of the Visual Basic .NET language can be found in the Roslyn repository. Until recently, that was also where language design artifacts were tracked. Please allow a little time as we move over active proposals.

DISCLAIMER: An active proposal is under active consideration for inclusion into a future version of the Visual Basic .NET programming language but is not in any way guaranteed to ultimately be included in the next or any version of the language. A proposal may be postponed or rejected at any time during any phase of the above process based on feedback from the design team, community, code reviewers, or testing.

下载源码

通过命令行克隆项目:

git clone https://github.com/dotnet/vblang.git

收藏 (0) 打赏

感谢您的支持,我会继续努力的!

打开微信/支付宝扫一扫,即可进行扫码打赏哦,分享从这里开始,精彩与您同在
点赞 (0)

申明:本文由第三方发布,内容仅代表作者观点,与本网站无关。对本文以及其中全部或者部分内容的真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。本网发布或转载文章出于传递更多信息之目的,并不意味着赞同其观点或证实其描述,也不代表本网对其真实性负责。

左子网 编程相关 vblang https://www.zuozi.net/33078.html

docs desktop
上一篇: docs desktop
cutlass
下一篇: cutlass
常见问题
  • 1、自动:拍下后,点击(下载)链接即可下载;2、手动:拍下后,联系卖家发放即可或者联系官方找开发者发货。
查看详情
  • 1、源码默认交易周期:手动发货商品为1-3天,并且用户付款金额将会进入平台担保直到交易完成或者3-7天即可发放,如遇纠纷无限期延长收款金额直至纠纷解决或者退款!;
查看详情
  • 1、描述:源码描述(含标题)与实际源码不一致的(例:货不对板); 2、演示:有演示站时,与实际源码小于95%一致的(但描述中有”不保证完全一样、有变化的可能性”类似显著声明的除外); 3、发货:不发货可无理由退款; 4、安装:免费提供安装服务的源码但卖家不履行的; 5、收费:价格虚标,额外收取其他费用的(但描述中有显著声明或双方交易前有商定的除外); 6、其他:如质量方面的硬性常规问题BUG等。 注:经核实符合上述任一,均支持退款,但卖家予以积极解决问题则除外。
查看详情
  • 1、左子会对双方交易的过程及交易商品的快照进行永久存档,以确保交易的真实、有效、安全! 2、左子无法对如“永久包更新”、“永久技术支持”等类似交易之后的商家承诺做担保,请买家自行鉴别; 3、在源码同时有网站演示与图片演示,且站演与图演不一致时,默认按图演作为纠纷评判依据(特别声明或有商定除外); 4、在没有”无任何正当退款依据”的前提下,商品写有”一旦售出,概不支持退款”等类似的声明,视为无效声明; 5、在未拍下前,双方在QQ上所商定的交易内容,亦可成为纠纷评判依据(商定与描述冲突时,商定为准); 6、因聊天记录可作为纠纷评判依据,故双方联系时,只与对方在左子上所留的QQ、手机号沟通,以防对方不承认自我承诺。 7、虽然交易产生纠纷的几率很小,但一定要保留如聊天记录、手机短信等这样的重要信息,以防产生纠纷时便于左子介入快速处理。
查看详情

相关文章

猜你喜欢
发表评论
暂无评论
官方客服团队

为您解决烦忧 - 24小时在线 专业服务